TY - JOUR
T1 - Crossing Boundaries
T2 - Nativity, Ethnicity, and Mate Selection
AU - Qian, Zhenchao
AU - Glick, Jennifer E.
AU - Batson, Christie D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant (1 R01 HD43035-01) from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. We thank Dan Lichter, Grace Kao, and several anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - The influx of immigrants has increased diversity among ethnic minorities and indicates that they may take multiple integration paths in American society. Previous research on ethnic integration has often focused on panethnic differences, and few have explored ethnic diversity within a racial or panethnic context. Using 2000 U. S. census data for Puerto Rican-, Mexican-, Chinese-, and Filipino-origin individuals, we examine differences in marriage and cohabitation with whites, with other minorities, within a panethnic group, and within an ethnic group by nativity status. Ethnic endogamy is strong and, to a lesser extent, so is panethnic endogamy. Yet, marital or cohabiting unions with whites remain an important path of integration but differ significantly by ethnicity, nativity, age at arrival, and educational attainment. Meanwhile, ethnic differences in marriage and cohabitation with other racial or ethnic minorities are strong. Our analysis supports that unions with whites remain a major path of integration, but other paths of integration also become viable options for all ethnic groups.
AB - The influx of immigrants has increased diversity among ethnic minorities and indicates that they may take multiple integration paths in American society. Previous research on ethnic integration has often focused on panethnic differences, and few have explored ethnic diversity within a racial or panethnic context. Using 2000 U. S. census data for Puerto Rican-, Mexican-, Chinese-, and Filipino-origin individuals, we examine differences in marriage and cohabitation with whites, with other minorities, within a panethnic group, and within an ethnic group by nativity status. Ethnic endogamy is strong and, to a lesser extent, so is panethnic endogamy. Yet, marital or cohabiting unions with whites remain an important path of integration but differ significantly by ethnicity, nativity, age at arrival, and educational attainment. Meanwhile, ethnic differences in marriage and cohabitation with other racial or ethnic minorities are strong. Our analysis supports that unions with whites remain a major path of integration, but other paths of integration also become viable options for all ethnic groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859500106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859500106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13524-012-0090-3
DO - 10.1007/s13524-012-0090-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 22350840
AN - SCOPUS:84859500106
SN - 0070-3370
VL - 49
SP - 651
EP - 675
JO - Demography
JF - Demography
IS - 2
ER -