TY - JOUR
T1 - Curated collection for clinician educators
T2 - Six key papers on residency recruitment
AU - Schnapp, Benjamin H.
AU - Alvarez, Al’ai
AU - Bianchi, Riccardo
AU - Caretta-Weyer, Holly
AU - Jewell, Corlin
AU - Kalantari, Annahieta
AU - Lee, Eric
AU - Miller, Danielle
AU - Quinn, Antonia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Introduction: All emergency medicine (EM) residency programs must recruit new medical school graduates each year. The process is often overwhelming, with each program receiving far more applicants than available positions. We searched for evidence-based best practices to guide residency programs in screening, interviewing, and ranking applicants to ensure a high-performing and diverse residency class. Methods: A literature search was conducted on the topic of residency recruitment, utilizing a call on social media as well as multiple databases. After identifying relevant articles, we performed a modified Delphi process in three rounds, utilizing junior educators as well as more senior faculty. Results: We identified 51 relevant articles on the topic of residency recruitment. The Delphi process yielded six articles that were deemed most highly relevant over the three rounds. Transparency with selection criteria, holistic application review, standardized letters of evaluation, and blinding applicant files for interviewers were among noted best practices. Conclusions: Well-supported evidence-based practices exist for residency recruitment, and programs may benefit from understanding which common recruitment practices offer the most value. The articles discussed here provide a foundation for faculty looking to improve their program's recruiting practices.
AB - Introduction: All emergency medicine (EM) residency programs must recruit new medical school graduates each year. The process is often overwhelming, with each program receiving far more applicants than available positions. We searched for evidence-based best practices to guide residency programs in screening, interviewing, and ranking applicants to ensure a high-performing and diverse residency class. Methods: A literature search was conducted on the topic of residency recruitment, utilizing a call on social media as well as multiple databases. After identifying relevant articles, we performed a modified Delphi process in three rounds, utilizing junior educators as well as more senior faculty. Results: We identified 51 relevant articles on the topic of residency recruitment. The Delphi process yielded six articles that were deemed most highly relevant over the three rounds. Transparency with selection criteria, holistic application review, standardized letters of evaluation, and blinding applicant files for interviewers were among noted best practices. Conclusions: Well-supported evidence-based practices exist for residency recruitment, and programs may benefit from understanding which common recruitment practices offer the most value. The articles discussed here provide a foundation for faculty looking to improve their program's recruiting practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105092932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105092932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/aet2.10597
DO - 10.1002/aet2.10597
M3 - Article
C2 - 33969251
AN - SCOPUS:85105092932
SN - 2472-5390
VL - 5
JO - AEM Education and Training
JF - AEM Education and Training
IS - 2
M1 - e10597
ER -