Abstract
Increased understanding of the pathology and natural history of colorectal cancer has led to significant advances in the management of this disease. Surgical management of rectal cancer currently includes a spectrum of operative procedures ranging from radical operations to innovative sphincter-preserving techniques. At one end of the spectrum, 5% to 10% of patients present with small, superfically invasive rectal cancers amenable to a curative local excision. At the other end, a subset of patients present with locally advanced rectal cancers that require multimodality therapy, including sharp pelvic dissection with en-bloc resection of involved organs. However, the majority of rectal cancer patients present with nonfixed, yet deeply invasive, lesions requiring either a low anterior resection (LAR) or an abdominal perineal resection (APR). This report will address the controversies in the surgical management of colorectal cancer.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-513 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Seminars in oncology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| State | Published - 1999 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Hematology
- Oncology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Current issues in colorectal cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver