TY - JOUR
T1 - Data Aggregation in Multilevel Research
T2 - Best Practice Recommendations and Tools for Moving Forward
AU - LeBreton, James M.
AU - Moeller, Amanda N.
AU - Wittmer, Jenell L.S.
N1 - Funding Information:
None of the authors received support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - The multilevel paradigm is omnipresent in the organizational sciences, with scholars recognizing data are almost always nested – either hierarchically (e.g., individuals within teams) or temporally (e.g., repeated observations within individuals). The multilevel paradigm is moored in the assumption that relationships between constructs often reside across different levels, often requiring data from a lower-level (e.g., employee-level justice perceptions) to be aggregated to a higher-level (e.g., team-level justice climate). Given the increased scrutiny in the social sciences around issues of clarity, transparency, and reproducibility, this paper first introduces a set of data aggregation principles that are then used to guide a brief literature review. We found that reporting practices related to data aggregation are quite variable with little standardization as to what information and statistics are included by authors. We conclude our paper with a Data Aggregation Checklist and a new R package, WGA (Within-Group Agreement & Aggregation), intended to improve the clarity and transparency of future multilevel studies.
AB - The multilevel paradigm is omnipresent in the organizational sciences, with scholars recognizing data are almost always nested – either hierarchically (e.g., individuals within teams) or temporally (e.g., repeated observations within individuals). The multilevel paradigm is moored in the assumption that relationships between constructs often reside across different levels, often requiring data from a lower-level (e.g., employee-level justice perceptions) to be aggregated to a higher-level (e.g., team-level justice climate). Given the increased scrutiny in the social sciences around issues of clarity, transparency, and reproducibility, this paper first introduces a set of data aggregation principles that are then used to guide a brief literature review. We found that reporting practices related to data aggregation are quite variable with little standardization as to what information and statistics are included by authors. We conclude our paper with a Data Aggregation Checklist and a new R package, WGA (Within-Group Agreement & Aggregation), intended to improve the clarity and transparency of future multilevel studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142375913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142375913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10869-022-09853-9
DO - 10.1007/s10869-022-09853-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142375913
SN - 0889-3268
VL - 38
SP - 239
EP - 258
JO - Journal of Business and Psychology
JF - Journal of Business and Psychology
IS - 2
ER -