TY - JOUR
T1 - DCMIP2016
T2 - The splitting supercell test case
AU - Zarzycki, Colin M.
AU - Jablonowski, Christiane
AU - Kent, James
AU - Lauritzen, Peter H.
AU - Nair, Ramachandran
AU - Reed, Kevin A.
AU - Ullrich, Paul A.
AU - Hall, David M.
AU - Taylor, Mark A.
AU - Dazlich, Don
AU - Heikes, Ross
AU - Konor, Celal
AU - Randall, David
AU - Chen, Xi
AU - Harris, Lucas
AU - Giorgetta, Marco
AU - Reinert, Daniel
AU - Kühnlein, Christian
AU - Walko, Robert
AU - Lee, Vivian
AU - Qaddouri, Abdessamad
AU - Tanguay, Monique
AU - Miura, Hiroaki
AU - Ohno, Tomoki
AU - Yoshida, Ryuji
AU - Park, Sang Hun
AU - Klemp, Joseph B.
AU - Skamarock, William C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s).
PY - 2019/3/5
Y1 - 2019/3/5
N2 - This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.
AB - This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062564133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062564133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019
DO - 10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062564133
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 12
SP - 879
EP - 892
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 3
ER -