TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining effective communication for critically ill patients with an artificial airway
T2 - An international multi-professional consensus
AU - Zaga, Charissa J.
AU - Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
AU - Happ, Mary Beth
AU - Hoit, Jeannette D.
AU - McGrath, Brendan A.
AU - Pandian, Vinciya
AU - Quraishi-Akhtar, Tanviha
AU - Rose, Louise
AU - Sutt, Anna Liisa
AU - Tuinman, Pieter R.
AU - Wallace, Sarah
AU - Bellomo, Rinaldo
AU - Berney, Sue
AU - Vogel, Adam P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Objectives: To define effective communication and identify its key elements specific to critically ill patients with an artificial airway. Design: A modified Consensus Development Panel methodology. Setting: International video-conferences. Main outcome measures: Definition of effective communication and it's key elements. Results: Eight experts across four international regions and three professions agreed to form the Consensus Development Panel together with a Chair and one person with lived experience who reviewed the outputs prior to finalisation. “Communication for critically ill adult patients with an artificial airway (endotracheal or tracheostomy tube) is defined as the degree in which a patient can initiate, impart, receive, and understand information, and can range from an ineffective to effective exchange of basic to complex information between the patient and the communication partner(s). Effective communication encompasses seven key elements including: comprehension, quantity, rate, effort, duration, independence, and satisfaction. In critically ill adults, communication is impacted by factors including medical, physical and cognitive status, delirium, fatigue, emotional status, the communication partner and the nature of the ICU environment (e.g., staff wearing personal protective equipment, noisy equipment, bright lights).” The panel agreed that communication occurs on a continuum from ineffective to effective for basic and complex communication. Conclusion: We developed a definition and list of key elements which constitute effective communication for critically ill patients with an artificial airway. These can be used as the basis of standard terminology to support future research on the development of communication-related outcome measurement tools in this population. Implications for clinical practice: This study provides international multi-professional consensus terminology and a definition of effective communication which can be used in clinical practice. This standard definition and key elements of effective communication can be included in our clinical impressions of patient communication, and be used in discussion with the patient themselves, their families and the multi-professional team, to guide care, goal development and intervention.
AB - Objectives: To define effective communication and identify its key elements specific to critically ill patients with an artificial airway. Design: A modified Consensus Development Panel methodology. Setting: International video-conferences. Main outcome measures: Definition of effective communication and it's key elements. Results: Eight experts across four international regions and three professions agreed to form the Consensus Development Panel together with a Chair and one person with lived experience who reviewed the outputs prior to finalisation. “Communication for critically ill adult patients with an artificial airway (endotracheal or tracheostomy tube) is defined as the degree in which a patient can initiate, impart, receive, and understand information, and can range from an ineffective to effective exchange of basic to complex information between the patient and the communication partner(s). Effective communication encompasses seven key elements including: comprehension, quantity, rate, effort, duration, independence, and satisfaction. In critically ill adults, communication is impacted by factors including medical, physical and cognitive status, delirium, fatigue, emotional status, the communication partner and the nature of the ICU environment (e.g., staff wearing personal protective equipment, noisy equipment, bright lights).” The panel agreed that communication occurs on a continuum from ineffective to effective for basic and complex communication. Conclusion: We developed a definition and list of key elements which constitute effective communication for critically ill patients with an artificial airway. These can be used as the basis of standard terminology to support future research on the development of communication-related outcome measurement tools in this population. Implications for clinical practice: This study provides international multi-professional consensus terminology and a definition of effective communication which can be used in clinical practice. This standard definition and key elements of effective communication can be included in our clinical impressions of patient communication, and be used in discussion with the patient themselves, their families and the multi-professional team, to guide care, goal development and intervention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146849091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146849091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103393
DO - 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103393
M3 - Article
C2 - 36706499
AN - SCOPUS:85146849091
SN - 0964-3397
VL - 76
JO - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
JF - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
M1 - 103393
ER -