TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome
AU - Kellis, Manolis
AU - Wold, Barbara
AU - Snyder, Michael P.
AU - Bernstein, Bradley E.
AU - Kundaje, Anshul
AU - Marinov, Georgi K.
AU - Ward, Lucas D.
AU - Birney, Ewan
AU - Crawford, Gregory E.
AU - Dekker, Job
AU - Dunham, Ian
AU - Elnitski, Laura L.
AU - Farnham, Peggy J.
AU - Feingold, Elise A.
AU - Gerstein, Mark
AU - Giddings, Morgan C.
AU - Gilbert, David M.
AU - Gingeras, Thomas R.
AU - Green, Eric D.
AU - Guigo, Roderic
AU - Hubbard, Tim
AU - Kent, Jim
AU - Lieb, Jason D.
AU - Myers, Richard M.
AU - Pazin, Michael J.
AU - Ren, Bing
AU - Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
AU - Weng, Zhiping
AU - White, Kevin P.
AU - Hardison, Ross C.
PY - 2014/4/29
Y1 - 2014/4/29
N2 - With the completion of the human genome sequence, attention turned to identifying and annotating its functional DNA elements. As a complement to genetic and comparative genomics approaches, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project was launched to contribute maps of RNA transcripts, transcriptional regulator binding sites, and chromatin states in many cell types. The resulting genome-wide data reveal sites of biochemical activity with high positional resolution and cell type specificity that facilitate studies of gene regulation and interpretation of noncoding variants associated with human disease. However, the biochemically active regions cover a much larger fraction of the genome than do evolutionarily conserved regions, raising the question of whether nonconserved but biochemically active regions are truly functional. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of biochemical, evolutionary, and genetic approaches for defining functional DNA segments, potential sources for the observed differences in estimated genomic coverage, and the biological implications of these discrepancies. We also analyze the relationship between signal intensity, genomic coverage, and evolutionary conservation. Our results reinforce the principle that each approach provides complementary information and that we need to use combinations of all three to elucidate genome function in human biology and disease.
AB - With the completion of the human genome sequence, attention turned to identifying and annotating its functional DNA elements. As a complement to genetic and comparative genomics approaches, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project was launched to contribute maps of RNA transcripts, transcriptional regulator binding sites, and chromatin states in many cell types. The resulting genome-wide data reveal sites of biochemical activity with high positional resolution and cell type specificity that facilitate studies of gene regulation and interpretation of noncoding variants associated with human disease. However, the biochemically active regions cover a much larger fraction of the genome than do evolutionarily conserved regions, raising the question of whether nonconserved but biochemically active regions are truly functional. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of biochemical, evolutionary, and genetic approaches for defining functional DNA segments, potential sources for the observed differences in estimated genomic coverage, and the biological implications of these discrepancies. We also analyze the relationship between signal intensity, genomic coverage, and evolutionary conservation. Our results reinforce the principle that each approach provides complementary information and that we need to use combinations of all three to elucidate genome function in human biology and disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899633396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899633396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1318948111
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1318948111
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24753594
AN - SCOPUS:84899633396
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 111
SP - 6131
EP - 6138
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 17
ER -