TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining the Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
T2 - A Multicenter, Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Cost Optimization Investigation
AU - The Avant-Garde Health and Codman Shoulder Society Value Based Care Group
AU - Fedorka, Catherine J.
AU - Beck Da Silva Etges, Ana Paula
AU - Best, Matthew J.
AU - Liu, Harry H.
AU - Zhang, Xiaoran
AU - Sanders, Brett
AU - Abboud, Joseph A.
AU - Fares, Mohamad Y.
AU - Kirsch, Jacob M.
AU - Simon, Jason E.
AU - Woodmass, Jarret
AU - Jones, Porter
AU - Haas, Derek A.
AU - Armstrong, April D.
AU - Srikumaran, Uma
AU - Wagner, Eric R.
AU - Gottschalk, Michael B.
AU - Khan, Adam Z.
AU - Costouros, John G.
AU - Warner, Jon J.P.
AU - O'donnell, Evan A.
AU - Khan, Adam Z.
AU - Warner, Jon J.P.
AU - O'Donnell, Evan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Background: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs. Methods: Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs. Results: In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals. Conclusions: This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.
AB - Background: Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a frequently performed outpatient orthopaedic surgery, with substantial financial implications for health-care systems. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method for nuanced cost analysis and is a valuable tool for strategic health-care decision-making. The aim of this study was to apply the TDABC methodology to RCR procedures to identify specific avenues to optimize cost-efficiency within the health-care system in 2 critical areas: (1) the reduction of variability in the episode duration, and (2) the standardization of suture anchor acquisition costs. Methods: Using a multicenter, retrospective design, this study incorporates data from all patients who underwent an RCR surgical procedure at 1 of 4 academic tertiary health systems across the United States. Data were extracted from Avant-Garde Health's Care Measurement platform and were analyzed utilizing TDABC methodology. Cost analysis was performed using 2 primary metrics: the opportunity costs arising from a possible reduction in episode duration variability, and the potential monetary savings achievable through the standardization of suture anchor costs. Results: In this study, 921 RCR cases performed at 4 institutions had a mean episode duration cost of $4,094 ± $1,850. There was a significant threefold cost variability between the 10th percentile ($2,282) and the 90th percentile ($6,833) (p < 0.01). The mean episode duration was registered at 7.1 hours. The largest variability in the episode duration was time spent in the post-acute care unit and the ward after the surgical procedure. By reducing the episode duration variability, it was estimated that up to 640 care-hours could be saved annually at a single hospital. Likewise, standardizing suture anchor acquisition costs could generate direct savings totaling $217,440 across the hospitals. Conclusions: This multicenter study offers valuable insights into RCR cost as a function of care pathways and suture anchor cost. It outlines avenues for achieving cost-savings and operational efficiency. These findings can serve as a foundational basis for developing health-economics models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210143218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85210143218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.23.01351
DO - 10.2106/JBJS.23.01351
M3 - Article
C2 - 39813412
AN - SCOPUS:85210143218
SN - 0021-9355
VL - 107
SP - 9
EP - 15
JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
IS - 1
ER -