Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Delaying the American Board of Emergency Medicine qualifying examination is associated with poorer performance

  • Catherine A. Marco
  • , Francis L. Counselman
  • , Robert C. Korte
  • , Robert G. Purosky
  • , Cameron Thomas Whitley
  • , Earl J. Reisdorff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives The initial step in certification by the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) requires passing a multiple-choice-question qualifying examination. The qualifying examination is typically taken in the first year after residency training. This study was undertaken to determine if a delay in taking the qualifying examination is associated with poorer performance. The authors also examined the relationship between in-training examination scores and qualifying examination scores. Methods This was a pooled time-series cross-section study. Primary measurements were initial qualifying examination scores, the timing of the qualifying examination, and in-training examination scores. The three groups, based on qualifying examination timing, were immediate, 1-year delay, and ≥2-year delay. In-training examination scores were analyzed to determine the relationship between intrinsic ability, examination timing, and qualifying examination scores. For analysis, a generic pooled ordinary least-squares dummy variable model with robust standard errors was used. A pre hoc level of significance was determined to be α < 0.01. Results There were 16,353 qualifying examination test administrations between 2000 and 2012. In-training examination scores were positively correlated with qualifying examination scores (p < 0.001). The group pass rates were 98.9% immediate, 95.6% 1-year delay, and 86.6% ≥2-year delay. After controlling for in-training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination of 1 year was associated with a decrease in score of -0.6 (p = 0.003). A delay in taking the qualifying examination ≥2 years was associated with a decrease in score of -2.5 points (p < 0.001). Conclusions After accounting for innate ability using in-training examination scores, delay taking the qualifying examination was associated with poorer performance. This effect was more pronounced if the delay was ≥2 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)688-693
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delaying the American Board of Emergency Medicine qualifying examination is associated with poorer performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this