TY - JOUR
T1 - Delineation of the primary tumour Clinical Target Volumes (CTV-P) in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - AIRO, CACA, DAHANCA, EORTC, GEORCC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, HNCIG, IAG-KHT, LPRHHT, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, PHNS, SBRT, SOMERA, SRO, SSHNO, TROG consensus guidelines
AU - Grégoire, Vincent
AU - Evans, Mererid
AU - Le, Quynh Thu
AU - Bourhis, Jean
AU - Budach, Volker
AU - Chen, Amy
AU - Eisbruch, Abraham
AU - Feng, Mei
AU - Giralt, Jordi
AU - Gupta, Tejpal
AU - Hamoir, Marc
AU - Helito, Juliana K.
AU - Hu, Chaosu
AU - Hunter, Keith
AU - Johansen, Jorgen
AU - Kaanders, Johannes
AU - Laskar, Sarbani Ghosh
AU - Lee, Anne
AU - Maingon, Philippe
AU - Mäkitie, Antti
AU - Micciche, Francesco
AU - Nicolai, Piero
AU - O'Sullivan, Brian
AU - Poitevin, Adela
AU - Porceddu, Sandro
AU - Składowski, Krzysztof
AU - Tribius, Silke
AU - Waldron, John
AU - Wee, Joseph
AU - Yao, Min
AU - Yom, Sue S.
AU - Zimmermann, Frank
AU - Grau, Cai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Purpose: Few studies have reported large inter-observer variations in target volume selection and delineation in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Consensus guidelines have been published for the neck nodes (see Grégoire et al., 2003, 2014), but such recommendations are lacking for primary tumour delineation. For the latter, two main schools of thoughts are prevailing, one based on geometric expansion of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) as promoted by DAHANCA, and the other one based on anatomical expansion of the GTV using compartmentalization of head and neck anatomy. Method: For each anatomic location within the larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx and oral cavity, and for each T-stage, the DAHANCA proposal has been comprehensively reviewed and edited to include anatomic knowledge into the geometric Clinical Target Volume (CTV) delineation concept. A first proposal was put forward by the leading authors of this publication (VG and CG) and discussed with opinion leaders in head and neck radiation oncology from Europe, Asia, Australia/New Zealand, North America and South America to reach a worldwide consensus. Results: This consensus proposes two CTVs for the primary tumour, the so called CTV-P1 and CVT-P2, corresponding to a high and lower tumour burden, and which should be associated with a high and a lower dose prescription, respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of these guidelines in the daily practice of radiation oncology should contribute to reduce treatment variations from clinicians to clinicians, facilitate the conduct of multi-institutional clinical trials, and contribute to improved care of patients with head and neck carcinoma.
AB - Purpose: Few studies have reported large inter-observer variations in target volume selection and delineation in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Consensus guidelines have been published for the neck nodes (see Grégoire et al., 2003, 2014), but such recommendations are lacking for primary tumour delineation. For the latter, two main schools of thoughts are prevailing, one based on geometric expansion of the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) as promoted by DAHANCA, and the other one based on anatomical expansion of the GTV using compartmentalization of head and neck anatomy. Method: For each anatomic location within the larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx and oral cavity, and for each T-stage, the DAHANCA proposal has been comprehensively reviewed and edited to include anatomic knowledge into the geometric Clinical Target Volume (CTV) delineation concept. A first proposal was put forward by the leading authors of this publication (VG and CG) and discussed with opinion leaders in head and neck radiation oncology from Europe, Asia, Australia/New Zealand, North America and South America to reach a worldwide consensus. Results: This consensus proposes two CTVs for the primary tumour, the so called CTV-P1 and CVT-P2, corresponding to a high and lower tumour burden, and which should be associated with a high and a lower dose prescription, respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of these guidelines in the daily practice of radiation oncology should contribute to reduce treatment variations from clinicians to clinicians, facilitate the conduct of multi-institutional clinical trials, and contribute to improved care of patients with head and neck carcinoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035190885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035190885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 29180076
AN - SCOPUS:85035190885
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 126
SP - 3
EP - 24
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -