TY - JOUR
T1 - Demand for prescription drugs under non-linear pricing in Medicare Part D
AU - Jung, Kyoungrae
AU - Feldman, Roger
AU - McBean, A. Marshall
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This project was supported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Contract HHSM-500-2005-00271. We are grateful to Randall Ellis for his helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - We estimate the price elasticity of prescription drug use in Medicare Part D, which features a non-linear price schedule due to a coverage gap. We analyze patterns of drug utilization prior to the coverage gap, where the "effective price" is higher than the actual copayment for drugs because consumers anticipate that more spending will make them more likely to reach the gap. We find that enrollees' total pre-gap drug spending is sensitive to their effective prices: the estimated price elasticity of drug spending ranges between -0.14 and -0.36. This finding suggests that filling in the coverage gap, as mandated by the health care reform legislation passed in 2010, will influence drug utilization prior to the gap. A simulation analysis indicates that closing the gap could increase Part D spending by a larger amount than projected, with additional pre-gap costs among those who do not hit the gap.
AB - We estimate the price elasticity of prescription drug use in Medicare Part D, which features a non-linear price schedule due to a coverage gap. We analyze patterns of drug utilization prior to the coverage gap, where the "effective price" is higher than the actual copayment for drugs because consumers anticipate that more spending will make them more likely to reach the gap. We find that enrollees' total pre-gap drug spending is sensitive to their effective prices: the estimated price elasticity of drug spending ranges between -0.14 and -0.36. This finding suggests that filling in the coverage gap, as mandated by the health care reform legislation passed in 2010, will influence drug utilization prior to the gap. A simulation analysis indicates that closing the gap could increase Part D spending by a larger amount than projected, with additional pre-gap costs among those who do not hit the gap.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897964871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897964871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10754-013-9137-2
DO - 10.1007/s10754-013-9137-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 24214101
AN - SCOPUS:84897964871
SN - 1389-6563
VL - 14
SP - 19
EP - 40
JO - International journal of health care finance and economics
JF - International journal of health care finance and economics
IS - 1
ER -