TY - JOUR
T1 - Demystifying Values-Affirmation Interventions
T2 - Writing About Social Belonging Is a Key to Buffering Against Identity Threat
AU - Shnabel, Nurit
AU - Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie
AU - Cook, Jonathan E.
AU - Garcia, Julio
AU - Cohen, Geoffrey L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Support for this research was provided by grants from National Science Foundation (NSF/REESE division Award ID 0723909), Spencer Foundation (Award 200800068), W.T. Grant Foundation, Russell Sage Foundation (Award 87-08-02), and Yale’s Institute for Social and Policy Studies.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Two experiments examined for the first time whether the specific content of participant-generated affirmation essays-in particular, writing about social belonging-facilitated an affirmation intervention's ability to reduce identity threat among negatively stereotyped students. Study 1, a field experiment, revealed that seventh graders assigned to a values-affirmation condition wrote about social belonging more than those assigned to a control condition. Writing about belonging, in turn, improved the grade point average (GPA) of Black, but not White students. In Study 2, using a modified "belonging-affirmation" intervention, we directly manipulated writing about social belonging before a math test described as diagnostic of math ability. The more female participants wrote about belonging, the better they performed, while there was no effect of writing about belonging for males. Writing about social belonging improved performance only for members of negatively stereotyped groups. Implications for self-affirmation theory and practice are discussed.
AB - Two experiments examined for the first time whether the specific content of participant-generated affirmation essays-in particular, writing about social belonging-facilitated an affirmation intervention's ability to reduce identity threat among negatively stereotyped students. Study 1, a field experiment, revealed that seventh graders assigned to a values-affirmation condition wrote about social belonging more than those assigned to a control condition. Writing about belonging, in turn, improved the grade point average (GPA) of Black, but not White students. In Study 2, using a modified "belonging-affirmation" intervention, we directly manipulated writing about social belonging before a math test described as diagnostic of math ability. The more female participants wrote about belonging, the better they performed, while there was no effect of writing about belonging for males. Writing about social belonging improved performance only for members of negatively stereotyped groups. Implications for self-affirmation theory and practice are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876430416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876430416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0146167213480816
DO - 10.1177/0146167213480816
M3 - Article
C2 - 23478675
AN - SCOPUS:84876430416
SN - 0146-1672
VL - 39
SP - 663
EP - 676
JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
IS - 5
ER -