Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Derivation conditions impact x-inactivation status in female human induced pluripotent stem cells

  • Kiichiro Tomoda
  • , Kazutoshi Takahashi
  • , Karen Leung
  • , Aki Okada
  • , Megumi Narita
  • , N. Alice Yamada
  • , Kirsten E. Eilertson
  • , Peter Tsang
  • , Shiro Baba
  • , Mark P. White
  • , Salma Sami
  • , Deepak Srivastava
  • , Bruce R. Conklin
  • , Barbara Panning
  • , Shinya Yamanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Female human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines exhibit variability in X-inactivation status. The majority of hiPSC lines maintain one transcriptionally active X (Xa) and one inactive X (Xi) chromosome from donor cells. However, at low frequency, hiPSC lines with two Xas are produced, suggesting that epigenetic alterations of the Xi occur sporadically during reprogramming. We show here that X-inactivation status in female hiPSC lines depends on derivation conditions. hiPSC lines generated by the Kyoto method (retroviral or episomal reprogramming), which uses leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-expressing SNL feeders, frequently had two Xas. Early passage Xa/Xi hiPSC lines generated on non-SNL feeders were converted into Xa/Xa hiPSC lines after several passages on SNL feeders, and supplementation with recombinant LIF caused reactivation of some of X-linked genes. Thus, feeders are a significant factor affecting X-inactivation status. The efficient production of Xa/Xa hiPSC lines provides unprecedented opportunities to understand human X-reactivation and -inactivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-99
Number of pages9
JournalCell Stem Cell
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 6 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Derivation conditions impact x-inactivation status in female human induced pluripotent stem cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this