Abstract
H. C. Kraemer's (see record 1981-24709-001) view of the state of the art in psychiatric research and her suggested coping strategies for problems of design and analysis are questioned. Information regarding population characteristics, clinically significant effects, and error risk can be obtained and are necessary for adequate design and meaningful results. Application of universal guidelines is not an appropriate solution to the problems that plague clinical research. Some alternative strategies to these problems are suggested. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 581-584 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 1982 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Design issues in clinical research: Comment on Kraemer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver