Desirable Difficulties in Language Learning? How Talker Variability Impacts Artificial Grammar Learning

Federica Bulgarelli, Daniel J. Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contending with talker variability has been found to lead to processing costs but also benefits by focusing learners on invariant properties of the signal, indicating that talker variability acts as a desirable difficulty. That is, talker variability may lead to initial costs followed by long-term benefits for retention and generalization. Adult participants learned an artificial grammar affording learning of multiple components in two experiments varying in difficulty. They learned from one, two, or eight talkers and were tested at three time points. The eight-talker condition did not impact learning. The two-talker condition negatively impacted some aspects of learning, but only under more difficult conditions. Generalization of the grammatical dependency was difficult. Thus, we discovered that high and limited talker variability can differentially impact artificial grammar learning. However, talker variability did not act as a desirable difficulty in the current paradigm as the few evidenced costs were not related to long-term benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1085-1121
Number of pages37
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Desirable Difficulties in Language Learning? How Talker Variability Impacts Artificial Grammar Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this