TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma
AU - Rieken, Malte
AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.
AU - Kluth, Luis A.
AU - Capitanio, Umberto
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - Thompson, R. Houston
AU - Leibovich, Bradley C.
AU - Krabbe, Laura Maria
AU - Margulis, Vitaly
AU - Raman, Jay D.
AU - Regelman, Mikhail
AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
AU - Rouprêt, Morgan
AU - Abufaraj, Mohammad
AU - Foerster, Beat
AU - Gönen, Mithat
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Objectives: To develop and externally validate a model that quantifies the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) has, indeed, no lymph node metastasis (LNM). Patients and methods: Data from 1389 patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and lymph node dissection (LND) were analyzed. For external validation, we used data from 2270 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated the sensitivity of pathologic nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed a pathological nodal staging score (pNSS), which represents the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative as a function of the number of examined lymph nodes (LNs). Results: The mean and median number of LNs removed were 7.0 and 5.0 (standard deviation, SD 6.6; interquartile range, IQR 7.0) in the development cohort and 5.6 and 2.0 (SD 8.6, IQR 5.0) in the validation cohort, respectively. The probability of missing a positive LN decreased with increasing number of LNs examined. In both the validation and the development cohort, the number of LNs needed for correctly staging a patient as node negative increased with higher pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade. Conclusions: The number of examined LNs needed for adequate nodal staging in cRCC depends on pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade. We developed here and then externally validated a pNSS, which could help to refine patient counseling, decision-making regarding risk-stratified surveillance regimens and inclusion criteria for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.
AB - Objectives: To develop and externally validate a model that quantifies the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) has, indeed, no lymph node metastasis (LNM). Patients and methods: Data from 1389 patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and lymph node dissection (LND) were analyzed. For external validation, we used data from 2270 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated the sensitivity of pathologic nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed a pathological nodal staging score (pNSS), which represents the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative as a function of the number of examined lymph nodes (LNs). Results: The mean and median number of LNs removed were 7.0 and 5.0 (standard deviation, SD 6.6; interquartile range, IQR 7.0) in the development cohort and 5.6 and 2.0 (SD 8.6, IQR 5.0) in the validation cohort, respectively. The probability of missing a positive LN decreased with increasing number of LNs examined. In both the validation and the development cohort, the number of LNs needed for correctly staging a patient as node negative increased with higher pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade. Conclusions: The number of examined LNs needed for adequate nodal staging in cRCC depends on pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade. We developed here and then externally validated a pNSS, which could help to refine patient counseling, decision-making regarding risk-stratified surveillance regimens and inclusion criteria for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056278204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056278204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-018-2555-5
DO - 10.1007/s00345-018-2555-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 30406477
AN - SCOPUS:85056278204
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 37
SP - 1631
EP - 1637
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 8
ER -