TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and Initial Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation Scale (BTI-S)
AU - Chugani, Carla D.
AU - Mitchell, Michael E.
AU - Botanov, Yevgeny
AU - Linehan, Marsha M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Objective: We examined the psychometric properties of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Barriers to Implementation Scale (BTI-S). Method: Participants were clinicians completing a bipartite training, separated by 6 months of self-study, to implement DBT. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted with data collected from the initial training period (N = 790), while confirmatory factor analysis was based on data from the final training period (N = 660). Results: The final model included 26 items and 4 factors with overall acceptable fit, χ2(293, N = 660) = 460.989, p <.001, comparative fit index =.909, Tucker-Lewis index =.899, root mean square root mean square error of approximation (90% confidence interval) =.015. The internal reliability of the scores was low (range =.56 to.72). Conclusion: The final model fits reasonably well and measures four domains considered important for implementation of DBT. However, the low reliability of the scores indicates that the BTI-S would be improved with further development.
AB - Objective: We examined the psychometric properties of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Barriers to Implementation Scale (BTI-S). Method: Participants were clinicians completing a bipartite training, separated by 6 months of self-study, to implement DBT. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted with data collected from the initial training period (N = 790), while confirmatory factor analysis was based on data from the final training period (N = 660). Results: The final model included 26 items and 4 factors with overall acceptable fit, χ2(293, N = 660) = 460.989, p <.001, comparative fit index =.909, Tucker-Lewis index =.899, root mean square root mean square error of approximation (90% confidence interval) =.015. The internal reliability of the scores was low (range =.56 to.72). Conclusion: The final model fits reasonably well and measures four domains considered important for implementation of DBT. However, the low reliability of the scores indicates that the BTI-S would be improved with further development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017270495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017270495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jclp.22478
DO - 10.1002/jclp.22478
M3 - Article
C2 - 28380249
AN - SCOPUS:85017270495
SN - 0021-9762
VL - 73
SP - 1704
EP - 1716
JO - Journal of clinical psychology
JF - Journal of clinical psychology
IS - 12
ER -