TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a reference-based method for identifying and scoring indicators of condition for coastal plain riparian reaches
AU - Rheinhardt, Richard
AU - Brinson, Mark
AU - Brooks, Robert
AU - McKenney-Easterling, Mary
AU - Rubbo, Jennifer Masina
AU - Hite, Jeremy
AU - Armstrong, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) state grant program. Partial funding was also provided by USEPA's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Estuarine and Great Lakes (EaGLe) program through funding to Penn State University, US EPA Agreement (R-82868401). Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or in part by the USEPA, it has not been subjected to the Agency's required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - Indicators of riparian ecosystem condition for headwater coastal plain streams were identified from data obtained from a reference population of reaches ranging widely in ecological condition. Each indicator was associated with some facet of hydrologic, biogeochemical, and/or habitat functioning and to channel condition, riparian zone condition, or both. Variation in the condition of the indicators among reference reaches provided a framework for developing narratives that could be used to partition and score the condition of the indicators from 0 (severely altered) to 100 (relatively unaltered). The developed narratives were the basis for creating a scoring approach for assessing stream condition at the reach scale (100-m long × 60-m wide segment). This approach was designed to be a rapid, field-based assessment method (<1 h/site) that could be applied by resource professionals with several days of training in the method. Although most alterations to riparian reaches usually affect both channels and riparian zones together, the ability to score channel and riparian zone condition separately is useful for diagnosing problems and suggesting viable restoration options at the reach scale. The assessment method is also useful for comparing the condition of reaches relative to one another, thus offering guidance for prioritizing restoration efforts at a watershed scale.
AB - Indicators of riparian ecosystem condition for headwater coastal plain streams were identified from data obtained from a reference population of reaches ranging widely in ecological condition. Each indicator was associated with some facet of hydrologic, biogeochemical, and/or habitat functioning and to channel condition, riparian zone condition, or both. Variation in the condition of the indicators among reference reaches provided a framework for developing narratives that could be used to partition and score the condition of the indicators from 0 (severely altered) to 100 (relatively unaltered). The developed narratives were the basis for creating a scoring approach for assessing stream condition at the reach scale (100-m long × 60-m wide segment). This approach was designed to be a rapid, field-based assessment method (<1 h/site) that could be applied by resource professionals with several days of training in the method. Although most alterations to riparian reaches usually affect both channels and riparian zones together, the ability to score channel and riparian zone condition separately is useful for diagnosing problems and suggesting viable restoration options at the reach scale. The assessment method is also useful for comparing the condition of reaches relative to one another, thus offering guidance for prioritizing restoration efforts at a watershed scale.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846564820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846564820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.02.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33846564820
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 7
SP - 339
EP - 361
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
IS - 2
ER -