TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnoses per Encounter by Telephone, Televideo, and In-Office Visits
AU - Schlegel, Daniel
AU - Heron, Christopher
AU - Berg, Arthur
AU - Parascando, Jessica
AU - Silvis, Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Board of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Introduction: We sought to determine if there are differences between number of International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes per visit before and after COVID-19 when comparing in-office visits and between telemedicine vs in-office visits, toward the goal of determining value of telemedicine visits relative to in-office visits. Methods: We did a chart review study assessing the number of ICD-10 codes noted by providers at a large academic medical institution in 2019 and 2020. Only in-office visits were reviewed in 2019. The focus of analysis was on individual patient visits per visit type; however, a subset of patients who had visits in both 2019 and 2020 were also analyzed. We compared mean number of diagnoses for encounter types using encounter, billing and coding data. Results: We analyzed 211,829 patient encounters. For 2020, 73% were in office. Mean number of diagnoses per encounter for 2019 was 2.65 (in office only), compared with 3.04 in office, 2.76 telephone, and 2.48 televideo for 2020. Discussion: We found an increase in the number of diagnoses addressed during in-office visits from 2019 to 2020. When looking at diagnoses managed per visit, all 3 types of visits had similar complexity. These results may guide future reimbursement policy for telemedicine visits.
AB - Introduction: We sought to determine if there are differences between number of International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes per visit before and after COVID-19 when comparing in-office visits and between telemedicine vs in-office visits, toward the goal of determining value of telemedicine visits relative to in-office visits. Methods: We did a chart review study assessing the number of ICD-10 codes noted by providers at a large academic medical institution in 2019 and 2020. Only in-office visits were reviewed in 2019. The focus of analysis was on individual patient visits per visit type; however, a subset of patients who had visits in both 2019 and 2020 were also analyzed. We compared mean number of diagnoses for encounter types using encounter, billing and coding data. Results: We analyzed 211,829 patient encounters. For 2020, 73% were in office. Mean number of diagnoses per encounter for 2019 was 2.65 (in office only), compared with 3.04 in office, 2.76 telephone, and 2.48 televideo for 2020. Discussion: We found an increase in the number of diagnoses addressed during in-office visits from 2019 to 2020. When looking at diagnoses managed per visit, all 3 types of visits had similar complexity. These results may guide future reimbursement policy for telemedicine visits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131184974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131184974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210451
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210451
M3 - Article
C2 - 35641059
AN - SCOPUS:85131184974
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 35
SP - 491
EP - 496
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 3
ER -