TY - JOUR
T1 - Dietary Polyunsaturated to Saturated Fatty Acid Ratio as an Indicator for LDL Cholesterol Response
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
AU - Hart, Tricia L.
AU - Damani, Janhavi J.
AU - DiMattia, Zachary S.
AU - Tate, Kayla E.
AU - Jafari, Fatemeh
AU - Petersen, Kristina S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Background: Dietary guidelines recommend limiting saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake by replacing SFA with polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). PUFA and SFA have opposing effects on low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and therefore, the dietary ratio of PUFA to SFA (P:S) may be a better indicator of LDL cholesterol response than SFA alone. Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted to examine LDL cholesterol responses to higher P:S ratio diets compared with isoenergetic, total fat-matched diets with lower P:S ratios in healthy adults. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized complete feeding trials lasting ≥3 wk, including 2 test diets with P:S ratios differing by >0.3 that were matched for energy, fiber, and total fat, were included. Random effects meta-analysis was used to evaluate the mean difference (MD) in LDL cholesterol with higher P:S ratio diets compared to lower P:S ratio diets. Heterogeneity in the effect of the P:S ratio by SFA content of the test diets was also evaluated. Results: In total, 1001 publications were identified, and 24 publications reporting 24 trials (n = 1011) were eligible. Higher P:S ratio diets (median P:S ratio 1.2; PUFA 10.6% kcal; SFA 8.0% kcal; and MUFA 12.6% kcal) lowered LDL cholesterol [MD −9.83 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI): −13.63, −6.04; I2 = 79%] compared with lower P:S ratio diets (median P:S ratio 0.4; PUFA 4.4% kcal; SFA 12.5% kcal; and MUFA 14.6% kcal). Heterogeneity in the P:S ratio effect was observed by the test diet SFA content (P < 0.001). Higher compared to lower P:S ratio diets lowered LDL cholesterol (MD −15.72 mg/dL; 95% CI: −20.51, −10.92; I2 = 68%) when the test diets differed in SFA (≥2% kcal), but not when diets were SFA-matched (MD −3.45 mg/dL; 95% CI: −7.88, 0.98; I2 = 70%). Conclusions: Compared with lower P:S ratio diets, higher P:S ratio diets were associated with greater LDL cholesterol reductions in generally healthy adults, and this effect was stronger when PUFA replaced SFA. This trial was registered at Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42023452550.
AB - Background: Dietary guidelines recommend limiting saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake by replacing SFA with polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). PUFA and SFA have opposing effects on low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and therefore, the dietary ratio of PUFA to SFA (P:S) may be a better indicator of LDL cholesterol response than SFA alone. Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted to examine LDL cholesterol responses to higher P:S ratio diets compared with isoenergetic, total fat-matched diets with lower P:S ratios in healthy adults. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science was conducted. Randomized complete feeding trials lasting ≥3 wk, including 2 test diets with P:S ratios differing by >0.3 that were matched for energy, fiber, and total fat, were included. Random effects meta-analysis was used to evaluate the mean difference (MD) in LDL cholesterol with higher P:S ratio diets compared to lower P:S ratio diets. Heterogeneity in the effect of the P:S ratio by SFA content of the test diets was also evaluated. Results: In total, 1001 publications were identified, and 24 publications reporting 24 trials (n = 1011) were eligible. Higher P:S ratio diets (median P:S ratio 1.2; PUFA 10.6% kcal; SFA 8.0% kcal; and MUFA 12.6% kcal) lowered LDL cholesterol [MD −9.83 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI): −13.63, −6.04; I2 = 79%] compared with lower P:S ratio diets (median P:S ratio 0.4; PUFA 4.4% kcal; SFA 12.5% kcal; and MUFA 14.6% kcal). Heterogeneity in the P:S ratio effect was observed by the test diet SFA content (P < 0.001). Higher compared to lower P:S ratio diets lowered LDL cholesterol (MD −15.72 mg/dL; 95% CI: −20.51, −10.92; I2 = 68%) when the test diets differed in SFA (≥2% kcal), but not when diets were SFA-matched (MD −3.45 mg/dL; 95% CI: −7.88, 0.98; I2 = 70%). Conclusions: Compared with lower P:S ratio diets, higher P:S ratio diets were associated with greater LDL cholesterol reductions in generally healthy adults, and this effect was stronger when PUFA replaced SFA. This trial was registered at Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42023452550.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016471661
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105016471661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100502
DO - 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100502
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40885400
AN - SCOPUS:105016471661
SN - 2161-8313
VL - 16
JO - Advances in Nutrition
JF - Advances in Nutrition
IS - 10
M1 - 100502
ER -