Differences in LRFD and ASD outcomes for hardwood glued-laminated bridges

Heather Warren, Harvey B. Manbeck, John J. Janowiak, Ray Witmer

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review


This paper compares and calibrates the design outcomes of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) and allowable stress design (ASD) hardwood glued-laminated timber bridges. Calibrations are presented for northern red oak, red maple and yellow poplar glued-laminated girder beams and longitudinal deck panels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPaper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers
StatePublished - 1997
EventProceedings of the 1997 ASAE Annual International Meeting. Part 1 (of 3) - Minneapolis, MN, USA
Duration: Aug 10 1997Aug 14 1997

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in LRFD and ASD outcomes for hardwood glued-laminated bridges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this