Abstract
This paper compares and calibrates the design outcomes of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) and allowable stress design (ASD) hardwood glued-laminated timber bridges. Calibrations are presented for northern red oak, red maple and yellow poplar glued-laminated girder beams and longitudinal deck panels.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers |
| Volume | 3 |
| State | Published - 1997 |
| Event | Proceedings of the 1997 ASAE Annual International Meeting. Part 1 (of 3) - Minneapolis, MN, USA Duration: Aug 10 1997 → Aug 14 1997 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in LRFD and ASD outcomes for hardwood glued-laminated bridges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver