TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in Quality of Care Interactions Across Care Tasks in Assisted Living
AU - McPherson, Rachel
AU - Resnick, Barbara
AU - Holmes, Sarah
AU - Paudel, Anju
AU - Levy, Sorah
AU - Galik, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: The quality of care interactions is crucial for the quality of life of assisted living residents. However, limited research has explored how interaction quality varies across different care tasks. Purpose: This study aimed to assess whether the quality of care interactions differs by care task type in assisted living communities. Methods: This was a descriptive study done in 4 assisted living communities in Maryland. A total of 152 staff–resident care interactions were observed across various care tasks (eg, clinical care and dietary care) using an observation tool that categorizes the quality of the interaction as positive social, positive care, neutral, negative protective, or negative restrictive. Results: Most interactions were positive care (36%) and occurred during supportive/ambulatory care (34%). Care interactions during supportive/ambulatory care were significantly more negative than interactions during intimate personal care (P = .022). Conclusion: Future research should focus on interventions aimed at improving the quality of care interactions during supportive/ambulatory care tasks.
AB - Background: The quality of care interactions is crucial for the quality of life of assisted living residents. However, limited research has explored how interaction quality varies across different care tasks. Purpose: This study aimed to assess whether the quality of care interactions differs by care task type in assisted living communities. Methods: This was a descriptive study done in 4 assisted living communities in Maryland. A total of 152 staff–resident care interactions were observed across various care tasks (eg, clinical care and dietary care) using an observation tool that categorizes the quality of the interaction as positive social, positive care, neutral, negative protective, or negative restrictive. Results: Most interactions were positive care (36%) and occurred during supportive/ambulatory care (34%). Care interactions during supportive/ambulatory care were significantly more negative than interactions during intimate personal care (P = .022). Conclusion: Future research should focus on interventions aimed at improving the quality of care interactions during supportive/ambulatory care tasks.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005423611
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005423611#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000880
DO - 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000880
M3 - Article
C2 - 40343956
AN - SCOPUS:105005423611
SN - 1057-3631
JO - Journal of Nursing Care Quality
JF - Journal of Nursing Care Quality
M1 - 0880
ER -