Disability Training and Programme Conduciveness in Counselor Education: A Preliminary Assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Counselors from all speciality areas should be prepared to serve people with disabilities (PWDs). Thus, we examined how counselling students in CACREP accredited programmes evaluate their disability training and their programmes’ disability conduciveness, and how it differs by speciality area. Effects of discrimination, ableism, power, privilege, and oppression on the life of PWDs, disability multicultural counselling competencies, and environmental, attitudinal, and individual barriers for PWDs were the training areas with highest three mean scores, indicating greater student satisfaction. Specific skills for leading a group consists of PWDs, sexual and reproductive concerns of PWDs, and parenting by parents with disabilities had the lowest three mean scores, indicating lower level of satisfaction. Results highlighted the inadequacy in disability training for clinical mental health and school counselling programmes. For disability conduciveness, almost one-fourth of the participants reported their programmes not meeting any of the criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1391-1405
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Disability, Development and Education
Volume72
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disability Training and Programme Conduciveness in Counselor Education: A Preliminary Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this