Discourse of professional pedagogical vision in teacher education

Arzu Tanis Ozcelik, Scott P. McDonald

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been an emphasis in science education reform documents on the practices of science for many years (NRC, 1996, 2000, 2007, 2012) and most recently, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013) framed participating in science practices and discourses of science as a critical part of students’ science learning. Related research in science classrooms has demonstrated the importance of discourse (Kelly, 2011; Kelly & Crawford, 1997; Lemke, 1990; Roth, 2005), and how participating in authentic discourse forms a core part of participation in a disciplinary community (Lemke, 1990). The ways in which teachers engage students in talking science (Lemke, 1990; Moje, 1995; Roth, 1996) shape what counts as (Heap, 1991) science, as well as defining the epistemic knowledge students can develop through such discourses (Kelly, 2008, 2016). Thus, classroom science discourse constitutes a curriculum of science-in-the-making (Kelly, Chen, & Crawford, 1998).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTheory and Methods for Sociocultural Research in Science and Engineering Education
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages181-205
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781351139915
ISBN (Print)9780815351894
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 17 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discourse of professional pedagogical vision in teacher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this