Abstract
This letter highlights some issues which were overlooked in a recently published paper called maximum likelihood identification of inertial sensor noise model parameters. The latter paper does not consider existing alternative methods, which specifically tackle this issue in a possibly more direct manner and, although remaining a generally valid proposal, does not appear to improve on the earlier proposals. Finally, a simulation study rectifies the poor results of an estimator of reference in the same publication.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7466804 |
| Pages (from-to) | 5522-5523 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | IEEE Sensors Journal |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 15 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Instrumentation
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion on Maximum Likelihood-Based Methods for Inertial Sensor Calibration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver