Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is a pleasure to congratulate Ni et al. (Stat Methods Appl 490:1–32, 2021) on the recent advances in Bayesian graphical models reviewed in Ni et al. (Stat Methods Appl 490:1–32, 2021). The authors have given considerable thought to the construction and estimation of Bayesian graphical models that capture salient features of biological networks. My discussion focuses on computational challenges and opportunities along with priors, pointing out limitations of the Markov random field priors reviewed in Ni et al. (Stat Methods Appl 490:1–32, 2021) and exploring possible generalizations that capture additional features of conditional independence graphs, such as hub structure and clustering. I conclude with a short discussion of the intersection of graphical models and random graph models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-260
Number of pages8
JournalStatistical Methods and Applications
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this