Abstract
This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part of their teaching practice. Most agree this prescriptive approach discourages students from owning their texts, while simultaneously short-circuiting the learning process. However, few have asked why the compulsion to control student writing persists for some teachers. Applying ideas from Jerome Miller’s book The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis, this paper offers one possibility: The urge to inappropriately control student texts may come from our unwillingness to suffer. Can we, as teachers, allow our safe routines–our orderly worlds–to be disrupted by imperfect student writing?.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 130-141 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disrupted Routines: A Thoughtful Response to Controlling Student Writing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver