TY - JOUR
T1 - Dissociable mappings of tonic and phasic pupillary features onto cognitive processes involved in mental arithmetic
AU - Hoffing, Russell A.Cohen
AU - Lauharatanahirun, Nina
AU - Forster, Daniel E.
AU - Garcia, Javier O.
AU - Vettel, Jean M.
AU - Thurman, Steven M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Pupil size modulations have been used for decades as a window into the mind, and several pupillary features have been implicated in a variety of cognitive processes. Thus, a general challenge facing the field of pupillometry has been understanding which pupil features should be most relevant for explaining behavior in a given task domain. In the present study, a longitudinal design was employed where participants completed 8 biweekly sessions of a classic mental arithmetic task for the purposes of teasing apart the relationships between tonic/phasic pupil features (baseline, peak amplitude, peak latency) and two task-related cognitive processes including mental processing load (indexed by math question difficulty) and decision making (indexed by response times). We used multi-level modeling to account for individual variation while identifying pupil-to-behavior relationships at the single-trial and between-session levels. We show a dissociation between phasic and tonic features with peak amplitude and latency (but not baseline) driven by ongoing task-related processing, whereas baseline was driven by state-level effects that changed over a longer time period (i.e. weeks). Finally, we report a dissociation between peak amplitude and latency whereby amplitude reflected surprise and processing load, and latency reflected decision making times.
AB - Pupil size modulations have been used for decades as a window into the mind, and several pupillary features have been implicated in a variety of cognitive processes. Thus, a general challenge facing the field of pupillometry has been understanding which pupil features should be most relevant for explaining behavior in a given task domain. In the present study, a longitudinal design was employed where participants completed 8 biweekly sessions of a classic mental arithmetic task for the purposes of teasing apart the relationships between tonic/phasic pupil features (baseline, peak amplitude, peak latency) and two task-related cognitive processes including mental processing load (indexed by math question difficulty) and decision making (indexed by response times). We used multi-level modeling to account for individual variation while identifying pupil-to-behavior relationships at the single-trial and between-session levels. We show a dissociation between phasic and tonic features with peak amplitude and latency (but not baseline) driven by ongoing task-related processing, whereas baseline was driven by state-level effects that changed over a longer time period (i.e. weeks). Finally, we report a dissociation between peak amplitude and latency whereby amplitude reflected surprise and processing load, and latency reflected decision making times.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082171157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082171157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230517
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230517
M3 - Article
C2 - 32203562
AN - SCOPUS:85082171157
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 3
M1 - e0230517
ER -