TY - JOUR
T1 - Dissociating processes underlying level-1 visual perspective taking in adults
AU - Todd, Andrew R.
AU - Cameron, C. Daryl
AU - Simpson, Austin J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Trevor Cline, Minji Kim, McKenna Lange, Gustav Lundberg, Eli Schmidt, and Francesca Walton for assisting with data collection, and Dana Samson for sharing L1-VPT task materials. This research was facilitated by National Science Foundation Grants BCS-1523731 (awarded to ART) and BCS-1450943 (awarded to CDC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Although reasoning about other people's mental states has typically been thought to require effortful deliberation, evidence from indirect measures suggests that people may implicitly track others’ perspectives, spontaneously calculating what they see and know. We used a process-dissociation approach to investigate the unique contributions of automatic and controlled processes to level-1 visual perspective taking in adults. In Experiment 1, imposing time pressure reduced the ability to exert control over one's responses, but it left automatic processing of a target's perspective unchanged. In Experiment 2, automatic processing of a target's perspective was greater when the target was a human avatar versus a non-social entity, whereas controlled processing was relatively unaffected by the specific target. Our findings highlight the utility of a process-dissociation approach for increasing theoretical precision and generating new questions about the nature of perspective taking.
AB - Although reasoning about other people's mental states has typically been thought to require effortful deliberation, evidence from indirect measures suggests that people may implicitly track others’ perspectives, spontaneously calculating what they see and know. We used a process-dissociation approach to investigate the unique contributions of automatic and controlled processes to level-1 visual perspective taking in adults. In Experiment 1, imposing time pressure reduced the ability to exert control over one's responses, but it left automatic processing of a target's perspective unchanged. In Experiment 2, automatic processing of a target's perspective was greater when the target was a human avatar versus a non-social entity, whereas controlled processing was relatively unaffected by the specific target. Our findings highlight the utility of a process-dissociation approach for increasing theoretical precision and generating new questions about the nature of perspective taking.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010203654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010203654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 27915132
AN - SCOPUS:85010203654
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 159
SP - 97
EP - 101
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
ER -