TY - JOUR
T1 - Do children with reading difficulties experience writing difficulties? A meta-analysis.
AU - Graham, Steve
AU - Aitken, A. Angelique
AU - Hebert, Michael
AU - Camping, April
AU - Santangelo, Tanya
AU - Harris, Karen R.
AU - Eustice, Kristi
AU - Sweet, Joseph D.
AU - Ng, Clarence
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Psychological Association
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this meta-analysis, we examined whether children identified with reading difficulties (RD) evidence writing difficulties. We included studies comparing children with RD with (a) typically developing peers matched on age (k = 87 studies) and (b) typically developing younger peers with similar reading capabilities (k = 24 studies). Children identified with RD scored lower on measures of writing than their same age peers (g = −1.25) when all writing scores in a study were included in the analysis. This same pattern occurred for specific measures of writing: quality (g = −0.95), output (g = −0.66), organization (g = −0.72), sentence skills (g = −0.78), vocabulary (g = −1.17), syntax (g = −1.07), handwriting (g = −0.64), and spelling (g = −1.42). Differences in the writing scores of children identified with RD and same age peers were moderated by whether the writing assessment was a norm-referenced or researcher-designed measure when all writing measures or just spelling were included in the analyses. Depth of orthography for studies involving European languages also moderated differences in the spelling scores of children identified with RD and same age peers. Finally, children identified with RD scored lower on writing than younger peers with similar reading capabilities (g = −0.94) and more specifically on spelling (−0.93). We concluded that children with RD experience difficulties with writing, providing support for theoretical propositions of reading and writing connections as well as the importance of writing instruction for these students.
AB - In this meta-analysis, we examined whether children identified with reading difficulties (RD) evidence writing difficulties. We included studies comparing children with RD with (a) typically developing peers matched on age (k = 87 studies) and (b) typically developing younger peers with similar reading capabilities (k = 24 studies). Children identified with RD scored lower on measures of writing than their same age peers (g = −1.25) when all writing scores in a study were included in the analysis. This same pattern occurred for specific measures of writing: quality (g = −0.95), output (g = −0.66), organization (g = −0.72), sentence skills (g = −0.78), vocabulary (g = −1.17), syntax (g = −1.07), handwriting (g = −0.64), and spelling (g = −1.42). Differences in the writing scores of children identified with RD and same age peers were moderated by whether the writing assessment was a norm-referenced or researcher-designed measure when all writing measures or just spelling were included in the analyses. Depth of orthography for studies involving European languages also moderated differences in the spelling scores of children identified with RD and same age peers. Finally, children identified with RD scored lower on writing than younger peers with similar reading capabilities (g = −0.94) and more specifically on spelling (−0.93). We concluded that children with RD experience difficulties with writing, providing support for theoretical propositions of reading and writing connections as well as the importance of writing instruction for these students.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103502333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103502333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/edu0000643
DO - 10.1037/edu0000643
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103502333
SN - 0022-0663
JO - Journal of Educational Psychology
JF - Journal of Educational Psychology
ER -