TY - GEN
T1 - Do engineering creativity/innovation courses impact engineering innovativeness?
AU - Ferguson, Daniel
AU - Li, Wayne
AU - Weaver, Jonathan
AU - Ochs, John
AU - Jablokow, Kathryn
AU - Bell-Huff, Cristi
AU - Newstetter, Wendy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/12/12
Y1 - 2017/12/12
N2 - Through five years of previous NSF-sponsored research working with engineering education programs and major U.S. Corporations, we have identified the most important characteristics of engineering innovators (across and in each phase of the innovation process) and validated a new instrument (ABAKAS = Assessment of Behaviors, Attitudes, Knowledge, Attributes, and Skills) to assess them. In our context, an innovation is a product, process, or concept that has been discovered, developed, and implemented in a sustainable manner in a community. The innovation process is therefore defined to have a beginning (discovery), a middle (development) and a completion phase (implementation). Claims on how to create innovations or be more innovative are as popular as diet plans, but these claims are not connected by evidence to engineering student learning experiences and outcomes. Courses with titles like 'Innovation and Creativity for Engineers' have not provided assessment evidence that these courses positively impact or enable the characteristics that we now know comprise engineering innovativeness.
AB - Through five years of previous NSF-sponsored research working with engineering education programs and major U.S. Corporations, we have identified the most important characteristics of engineering innovators (across and in each phase of the innovation process) and validated a new instrument (ABAKAS = Assessment of Behaviors, Attitudes, Knowledge, Attributes, and Skills) to assess them. In our context, an innovation is a product, process, or concept that has been discovered, developed, and implemented in a sustainable manner in a community. The innovation process is therefore defined to have a beginning (discovery), a middle (development) and a completion phase (implementation). Claims on how to create innovations or be more innovative are as popular as diet plans, but these claims are not connected by evidence to engineering student learning experiences and outcomes. Courses with titles like 'Innovation and Creativity for Engineers' have not provided assessment evidence that these courses positively impact or enable the characteristics that we now know comprise engineering innovativeness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043270085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043270085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190628
DO - 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190628
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85043270085
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
SP - 1
EP - 5
BT - FIE 2017 - Frontiers in Education, Conference Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 47th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2017
Y2 - 18 October 2017 through 21 October 2017
ER -