Abstract
A data set for U.S. counties that includes residence status of firm owners is used to assess whether per capita density of locally owned businesses affects local economic growth, compared with nonlocal ownership. The database also permits stratification of firms across different employment size categories. Economic growth models that control for other relevant factors reveal a positive relationship between density of locally owned firms and per capita income growth but only for small (10-99 employees) firms, whereas the density of large (more than 500 workers) firms not owned locally has a negative effect. These results provide strong evidence that local ownership matters for economic growth but only in the small size category. Results are robust across rural and urban counties.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-281 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Economic Development Quarterly |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Development
- Economics and Econometrics
- Urban Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does local firm ownership matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver