TY - JOUR
T1 - Donors’ Responses to Profit Incentives in the Social Sector
T2 - The Entrepreneurial Orientation Reward and the Profit Penalty
AU - Faulk, Lewis
AU - Pandey, Sheela
AU - Pandey, Sanjay K.
AU - Scott Kennedy, Kristen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - This study uses an online survey experiment to test whether the pairing of profit-seeking with mission-related programs in the social sector attracts or deters donations from individual donors. We test individuals’ response to three types of profit incentives allowed under current U.S. public policy: (1) non-distributed profit to an organization, which is allowed for nonprofit entities; (2) profit to the organization's equity investors and owners, which is allowed under for-profit social enterprise governance charters; and (3) profit to lending investors, which is introduced by social impact bonds, a pay-for-success policy tool. We test trust theory, under which profit incentives deter donors against entrepreneurial orientation (EO) theory, which suggests that donors are attracted to organizations that use innovative, market-driven programs. Findings indicate support for both theories, but the support depends on how the specific profit incentive is structured. Donors support organizations that use profit-generating social enterprise programs—but only when the profits are non-distributable; donors’ support is significantly lower for social enterprises in which owners and equity investors may profit. Importantly however, this negative effect is not found for pay-for-success policy tools where lending investors, rather than equity investors and owners, receive profits.
AB - This study uses an online survey experiment to test whether the pairing of profit-seeking with mission-related programs in the social sector attracts or deters donations from individual donors. We test individuals’ response to three types of profit incentives allowed under current U.S. public policy: (1) non-distributed profit to an organization, which is allowed for nonprofit entities; (2) profit to the organization's equity investors and owners, which is allowed under for-profit social enterprise governance charters; and (3) profit to lending investors, which is introduced by social impact bonds, a pay-for-success policy tool. We test trust theory, under which profit incentives deter donors against entrepreneurial orientation (EO) theory, which suggests that donors are attracted to organizations that use innovative, market-driven programs. Findings indicate support for both theories, but the support depends on how the specific profit incentive is structured. Donors support organizations that use profit-generating social enterprise programs—but only when the profits are non-distributable; donors’ support is significantly lower for social enterprises in which owners and equity investors may profit. Importantly however, this negative effect is not found for pay-for-success policy tools where lending investors, rather than equity investors and owners, receive profits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075131482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075131482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pam.22179
DO - 10.1002/pam.22179
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075131482
SN - 0276-8739
VL - 39
SP - 218
EP - 242
JO - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
JF - Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
IS - 1
ER -