TY - JOUR
T1 - Dosing of Health and Wellness Coaching for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
T2 - Research Synthesis to Derive Recommendations
AU - Sforzo, Gary A.
AU - Kaye, Miranda P.
AU - Faber, Aubrey
AU - Moore, Margaret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Health and wellness coaching (HWC) is an effective intervention for lifestyle disease such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. The evolving HWC profession needs recommendations to guide clinical practice, particularly the appropriate dose of coaching. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review and synthesize HWC literature to derive HWC programming recommendations. Of 102 papers retrieved, 88 were retained with data extracted determining HWC session number, frequency, duration, program length, and total coaching load. Differential analysis yielded no statistical difference in programming variables for randomized control trials and other designs, nor for studies with significant findings v. those not finding statistical significance, allowing these data to be pooled. The HWC intervention for obesity was slightly more intense (15 sessions over 7-8 mo) than the diabetes programming (12 sessions over 9-10 mo). On average, HWC programming applied in the peer-reviewed literature was 12-15 sessions of 35-40 min duration over 7-9 months. These recommendations for HWC programming variables are put forth as initial practice guidelines and should be examined with comparative effectiveness study for optimization. HWC best practice guidelines for other patient groups (e.g., heart disease, cancer, and chronic pain) should also be studied once an adequate literature data base is available.
AB - Health and wellness coaching (HWC) is an effective intervention for lifestyle disease such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. The evolving HWC profession needs recommendations to guide clinical practice, particularly the appropriate dose of coaching. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review and synthesize HWC literature to derive HWC programming recommendations. Of 102 papers retrieved, 88 were retained with data extracted determining HWC session number, frequency, duration, program length, and total coaching load. Differential analysis yielded no statistical difference in programming variables for randomized control trials and other designs, nor for studies with significant findings v. those not finding statistical significance, allowing these data to be pooled. The HWC intervention for obesity was slightly more intense (15 sessions over 7-8 mo) than the diabetes programming (12 sessions over 9-10 mo). On average, HWC programming applied in the peer-reviewed literature was 12-15 sessions of 35-40 min duration over 7-9 months. These recommendations for HWC programming variables are put forth as initial practice guidelines and should be examined with comparative effectiveness study for optimization. HWC best practice guidelines for other patient groups (e.g., heart disease, cancer, and chronic pain) should also be studied once an adequate literature data base is available.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126070774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126070774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/15598276211073078
DO - 10.1177/15598276211073078
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37304739
AN - SCOPUS:85126070774
SN - 1559-8276
VL - 17
SP - 374
EP - 385
JO - American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
JF - American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
IS - 3
ER -