TY - JOUR
T1 - Drawing is Integrating
T2 - An Examination of Students’ Graphic Representations of Multiple Texts
AU - List, Alexandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/8/18
Y1 - 2019/8/18
N2 - In this study, integration, or students’ connection formation across texts, was examined across two tasks: when undergraduates were asked to complete a writing assignment and a novel, diagram construction task. While the writing assignment asked students to compose an argument based on multiple texts, the diagram construction task asked students to visually represent a set of eight conflicting texts and the relations among them. The Documents Model Framework (DM) was used to code undergraduates’ written responses and diagrams for the type of multiple text representations they featured (i.e., mush models, separate representations models, and documents models of multiple texts). Moreover, written responses and diagrams were coded for the specificity at which they integrated texts, corresponding to the formation of evidentiary, thematic, and contextual relations. Limited associations were found between college students’ written responses and the diagrams constructed. Implications for understanding multiple text integration are discussed.
AB - In this study, integration, or students’ connection formation across texts, was examined across two tasks: when undergraduates were asked to complete a writing assignment and a novel, diagram construction task. While the writing assignment asked students to compose an argument based on multiple texts, the diagram construction task asked students to visually represent a set of eight conflicting texts and the relations among them. The Documents Model Framework (DM) was used to code undergraduates’ written responses and diagrams for the type of multiple text representations they featured (i.e., mush models, separate representations models, and documents models of multiple texts). Moreover, written responses and diagrams were coded for the specificity at which they integrated texts, corresponding to the formation of evidentiary, thematic, and contextual relations. Limited associations were found between college students’ written responses and the diagrams constructed. Implications for understanding multiple text integration are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071068208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071068208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02702711.2019.1629517
DO - 10.1080/02702711.2019.1629517
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071068208
SN - 0270-2711
VL - 40
SP - 491
EP - 524
JO - Reading Psychology
JF - Reading Psychology
IS - 6
ER -