Drones and Dirty Hands

Benjamin Jones, John Parrish

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review


    The period known as the “War on Terror” has prompted a revival of interest in the idea of moral dilemmas and the problem of “dirty hands” in public life. Some contend that a policy of targeted killing of terrorist actors is (under specified but not uncommon circumstances) an instance of a dirty-handed moral dilemma – morally required yet morally forbidden, the least evil choice available in the circumstances, but one that nevertheless leaves an indelible moral stain on the character of the person who makes the choice. In this chapter we argue that, while dirty hands situations do exist as a persistent problem of political life, it is generally a mistake to classify policies of target killing (such as the current US policy) as examples of dirty hands. Instead, we maintain, such policies, if justified at all, must ordinarily be justified under the more exacting standards of just war theory and its provisions for justified killing – in particular the requirement that (with limited and defined exceptions) non-combatants be immune from intentional violence. Understanding this distinction both clarifies the significance of dirty hands as a moral phenomenon and also forestalls a set of predictable and all-too-easy appropriations of the concept to domains it was never intended to address.
    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationPreventive Force
    Subtitle of host publicationDrones, Targeted Killing, and the Transformation of Contemporary Warfare
    EditorsKerstin Fisk, Jennifer Ramos
    PublisherNew York University Press
    Number of pages30
    ISBN (Print)9781479857531
    StatePublished - 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Drones and Dirty Hands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this