TY - JOUR
T1 - Dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
AU - Tsivgoulis, Georgios
AU - Goyal, Nitin
AU - Kerro, Ali
AU - Katsanos, Aristeidis H.
AU - Krishnan, Rashi
AU - Malhotra, Konark
AU - Pandhi, Abhi
AU - Duden, Peter
AU - Deep, Aman
AU - Shahripour, Reza Bavarsad
AU - Bryndziar, Tomas
AU - Nearing, Katherine
AU - Chulpayev, Boris
AU - Chang, Jason
AU - Zand, Ramin
AU - Alexandrov, Anne W.
AU - Alexandrov, Andrei V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2018/9/11
Y1 - 2018/9/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality. RESULTS: Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 ± 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; p = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; p = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality. RESULTS: Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 ± 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; p = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; p = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064579290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064579290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168
M3 - Article
C2 - 30120131
AN - SCOPUS:85064579290
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 91
SP - e1067-e1076
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 11
ER -