TY - JOUR
T1 - Dual conversations
T2 - Body talk among young women and their social contacts
AU - O'Dougherty, Maureen
AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.
AU - Hearst, Mary O.
AU - Covelli, Michaela
AU - Kurzer, Mindy S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: Support was received from the National Cancer Institute’s Centers for Trans-disciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC; NCI Grant # U54CA116849 and 1R03CA150580-01).
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.
AB - In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051526475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051526475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1049732311405804
DO - 10.1177/1049732311405804
M3 - Article
C2 - 21508251
AN - SCOPUS:80051526475
SN - 1049-7323
VL - 21
SP - 1191
EP - 1204
JO - Qualitative Health Research
JF - Qualitative Health Research
IS - 9
ER -