TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Time Series Network Models
AU - Liu, Siwei
AU - Crawford, Christopher M.
AU - Fisher, Zachary F.
AU - Gates, Kathleen M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - In this study, we extend the dynamic fit index (DFI) developed by McNeish and Wolf to the context of time series analysis. DFI is a simulation-based method for deriving fit index cutoff values tailored to the specific model and data characteristics. Through simulations, we show that DFI cutoffs for detecting an omitted path in time series network models tend to be closer to exact fit than the popular benchmark values developed by Hu and Bentler. Moreover, cutoff values vary by number of variables, network density, number of time points, and form of misspecification. Notably, using 10% as the upper limit of Type I and Type II error rates, the original DFI approach fails to identify cutoffs for detecting an omitted path when effect size and/or sample size is small. To address this problem, we propose two alternatives that allow for the derivation of cutoffs using more lenient criteria. DFIA extends the original DFI approach by removing the upper limit of Type I and Type II error rates, whereas DFIB aims at maximizing classification quality measured by the Matthews correlation coefficient. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches using simulation and empirical data and discuss their implications in practice.
AB - In this study, we extend the dynamic fit index (DFI) developed by McNeish and Wolf to the context of time series analysis. DFI is a simulation-based method for deriving fit index cutoff values tailored to the specific model and data characteristics. Through simulations, we show that DFI cutoffs for detecting an omitted path in time series network models tend to be closer to exact fit than the popular benchmark values developed by Hu and Bentler. Moreover, cutoff values vary by number of variables, network density, number of time points, and form of misspecification. Notably, using 10% as the upper limit of Type I and Type II error rates, the original DFI approach fails to identify cutoffs for detecting an omitted path when effect size and/or sample size is small. To address this problem, we propose two alternatives that allow for the derivation of cutoffs using more lenient criteria. DFIA extends the original DFI approach by removing the upper limit of Type I and Type II error rates, whereas DFIB aims at maximizing classification quality measured by the Matthews correlation coefficient. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches using simulation and empirical data and discuss their implications in practice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017986273
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017986273#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2025.2561943
DO - 10.1080/00273171.2025.2561943
M3 - Article
C2 - 41032366
AN - SCOPUS:105017986273
SN - 0027-3171
JO - Multivariate Behavioral Research
JF - Multivariate Behavioral Research
ER -