TY - JOUR
T1 - Easing in
T2 - Fluent processing brings others into the ingroup
AU - Claypool, Heather M.
AU - Housley, Meghan K.
AU - Hugenberg, Kurt
AU - Bernstein, Michael J.
AU - Mackie, Diane M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0719694 awarded to Heather M. Claypool.
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Four experiments demonstrated that perceptual fluency can facilitate categorization of others as ingroup members. In Experiment 1 (replications A, B, and C), White participants were first exposed to a group of White target individuals and later judged whether fluent (repeated) and disfluent (novel) targets were members of a particular ingroup or not. In each replication, fluent targets were categorized as ingroup members more readily than were disfluent ones. Experiment 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that both White (racial ingroup) and Black (racial outgroup) targets were more frequently perceived as school ingroup members when fluent (repeated). In Experiments 3 and 4, fluency was manipulated via visual clarity and, again, fluency engendered more ingroup categorizations than did disfluency, for both racial ingroup and outgroup targets. Moreover, findings from Experiment 4 suggested that liking fully mediated the fluency-ingroup categorization relation. Implications of these findings for the literatures on fluency and intergroup relations are discussed.
AB - Four experiments demonstrated that perceptual fluency can facilitate categorization of others as ingroup members. In Experiment 1 (replications A, B, and C), White participants were first exposed to a group of White target individuals and later judged whether fluent (repeated) and disfluent (novel) targets were members of a particular ingroup or not. In each replication, fluent targets were categorized as ingroup members more readily than were disfluent ones. Experiment 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that both White (racial ingroup) and Black (racial outgroup) targets were more frequently perceived as school ingroup members when fluent (repeated). In Experiments 3 and 4, fluency was manipulated via visual clarity and, again, fluency engendered more ingroup categorizations than did disfluency, for both racial ingroup and outgroup targets. Moreover, findings from Experiment 4 suggested that liking fully mediated the fluency-ingroup categorization relation. Implications of these findings for the literatures on fluency and intergroup relations are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863220625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863220625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1368430212439115
DO - 10.1177/1368430212439115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84863220625
SN - 1368-4302
VL - 15
SP - 441
EP - 455
JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
IS - 4
ER -