Abstract
Is the authoritarian potential of policy elites a mortal threat to the consolidation of democracy in Latin America? This article suggests that in the context of democratic transitions, significant variations may exist in the performance of technocratic roles. In most countries in the region, elected governments faced the crisis of the 1980s by retaining markedly technocratic and exclusionary styles of policy-making. In Chile, a highly technocratic form of authoritarianism was succeeded by a novel pattern of pragmatic cooperation between technical and political elites. Democratic institutions were reestablished while a strong economic team enforced coherence and continuity in economic policy. Historical and institutional factors are used to show that Chile may now be nearer the democratic pole than other "hybrid" democratic-authoritarian regimes in the region.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 25-53 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Studies In Comparative International Development |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1993 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations