TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes
AU - Steinman, Alan D.
AU - Cardinale, Bradley J.
AU - Munns, Wayne R.
AU - Ogdahl, Mary E.
AU - Allan, J. David
AU - Angadi, Ted
AU - Bartlett, Sarah
AU - Brauman, Kate
AU - Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara
AU - Doss, Matt
AU - Dupont, Diane
AU - Johns, Annie
AU - Kashian, Donna
AU - Lupi, Frank
AU - McIntyre, Peter
AU - Miller, Todd
AU - Moore, Michael
AU - Muenich, Rebecca Logsdon
AU - Poudel, Rajendra
AU - Price, James
AU - Provencher, Bill
AU - Rea, Anne
AU - Read, Jennifer
AU - Renzetti, Steven
AU - Sohngen, Brent
AU - Washburn, Erika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Association for Great Lakes Research
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.
AB - A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014391100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014391100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85014391100
SN - 0380-1330
VL - 43
SP - 161
EP - 168
JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research
JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research
IS - 3
ER -