Abstract
Terrestrial ecosystem services have experienced evident decline in the past decades. Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services have been widely studied to understand the disturbance of human activities on ecosystems. However, the method for ecosystem services assessment remains incomplete, and a few studies of the trade-off analysis of ecosystem services have been conducted at the national scale. In this study, we conducted trade-off analysis of China’s ecosystem services—including supplying, regulating, supporting, and cultural services—using a newly revised benefit transfer method and the bivariate Moran’s I method during 2000–2015. We found an overall increasing tendency in ecosystem services value when comparing to the findings from previous studies. Synergy was the dominant relationship among the ecosystem services in China, but it varied spatially. The findings in this study have important implications for ecosystem services management in China and for ecosystem services value assessment in other regions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3221-3236 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver