TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of oil chemistry on the performance of low-salinity waterflooding in carbonates
T2 - An integrated experimental approach
AU - Tawfik, Miral S.
AU - Karpyn, Zuleima T.
AU - Johns, Russell T.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the John and Willie Leone family department of Energy and Mineral Engineering as well as Energi Simulation, OMV, ADNOC, Shell and KOC for their financial support through the Enhanced Oil Recovery Joint Industry Project (JIP) at the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Zuleima T. Karpyn is the associate dean of graduate education and research in the College of Earth and Mineral Sciences. She holds the Quentin and Louise Wood Chair in Petroleum and Natural gas engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Russell T. Johns holds the George E. Trimble Chair in Earth and Mineral Science at the Pennsylvania State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Chemical enhanced oil recovery (cEOR) relies on the interactions between surface-active components (SACs) of the oil-in-place and injected chemicals to induce favorable physico-chemical changes. This study investigates the effect of oil chemistry on the performance of chemically-tuned waterflooding (CTWF) in carbonate rocks. Coreflood experiments were performed at 90°C using four model oils, each containing a single SAC (acetic acid, decanoic acid, stearic acid or quinoline) to evaluate the effect of oil composition on oil recovery. Complementary characterization techniques including thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), attenuated total reflectance (ATR-FTIR) and zeta potential (ζ) were used to understand the underlying rock-oil-brine interactions that take place during CTWF, including SAC adsorption to the rock surface, strength of adsorption, partitioning into the brine phase, and electrostatic interactions, respectively. Sessile drop contact angle measurements were also performed to quantify the wetting behavior of the different SACs. Results of this study show that oil chemistry plays a significant role in triggering different oil-brine-rock interactions. Characterization of those interactions is crucial to explain the discrepancies in oil recovery observed in the CTWF literature. In this study, differences in the underlying oil-brine-rock interactions translated into significant variation in oil recovery ranging between 8.9 and 43.9 % after one pore volume injected (PVI). ATR-FTIR results showed that in-situ soap generation was detected for oils with longer chain carboxylic acids, whereas no soaps were observed for oils that have acetic acid or quinoline. Combined with sessile-drop contact angle measurements, a relationship is observed between SAC partitioning into the brine phase and water-wetting behavior. Additionally, TGA measurements suggested that long chain carboxylic acids chemisorb to the rock surface, making wettability alteration to a less oil-wetting state during CTWF more challenging, whereas intermediate chain carboxylic acids only physisorb leading to a more pronounced wettability alteration to a less oil-wetting state, ultimately yielding the highest recovery of ∼49.9 %. Finally, TAN was found to be an insufficient oil descriptor, where oils with the same TAN yielded different CTWF effects. Hence, a more robust oil analysis is crucial for more accurate prediction and modeling of CTWF behavior.
AB - Chemical enhanced oil recovery (cEOR) relies on the interactions between surface-active components (SACs) of the oil-in-place and injected chemicals to induce favorable physico-chemical changes. This study investigates the effect of oil chemistry on the performance of chemically-tuned waterflooding (CTWF) in carbonate rocks. Coreflood experiments were performed at 90°C using four model oils, each containing a single SAC (acetic acid, decanoic acid, stearic acid or quinoline) to evaluate the effect of oil composition on oil recovery. Complementary characterization techniques including thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), attenuated total reflectance (ATR-FTIR) and zeta potential (ζ) were used to understand the underlying rock-oil-brine interactions that take place during CTWF, including SAC adsorption to the rock surface, strength of adsorption, partitioning into the brine phase, and electrostatic interactions, respectively. Sessile drop contact angle measurements were also performed to quantify the wetting behavior of the different SACs. Results of this study show that oil chemistry plays a significant role in triggering different oil-brine-rock interactions. Characterization of those interactions is crucial to explain the discrepancies in oil recovery observed in the CTWF literature. In this study, differences in the underlying oil-brine-rock interactions translated into significant variation in oil recovery ranging between 8.9 and 43.9 % after one pore volume injected (PVI). ATR-FTIR results showed that in-situ soap generation was detected for oils with longer chain carboxylic acids, whereas no soaps were observed for oils that have acetic acid or quinoline. Combined with sessile-drop contact angle measurements, a relationship is observed between SAC partitioning into the brine phase and water-wetting behavior. Additionally, TGA measurements suggested that long chain carboxylic acids chemisorb to the rock surface, making wettability alteration to a less oil-wetting state during CTWF more challenging, whereas intermediate chain carboxylic acids only physisorb leading to a more pronounced wettability alteration to a less oil-wetting state, ultimately yielding the highest recovery of ∼49.9 %. Finally, TAN was found to be an insufficient oil descriptor, where oils with the same TAN yielded different CTWF effects. Hence, a more robust oil analysis is crucial for more accurate prediction and modeling of CTWF behavior.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135968082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135968082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125436
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125436
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135968082
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 329
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 125436
ER -