TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of three kinds of natural preservative cocktails on vacuum-packed chilled pork
AU - Li, Chen
AU - Han, Yuhang
AU - Fan, Sanhong
AU - Ma, Lizhen
AU - Zhang, Yi
AU - Simpson, Benjamin Kofi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different natural preservatives on the microbial profile, the total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N), and biogenic amine contents of vacuum-packed chilled pork during storage at 4°C. Solution A comprised of tea polyphenols, chitosan, spice extract, propolis, and nisin. Solution B comprised of clove extract, cassia bark extract, ginger juice, garlic juice, and lactobacillus fermentation solution. Solution C consisted of only lactobacillus fermentation solution. The results indicated that solution A was a good natural preservative with higher bacteria inhibitory effect and higher sensory score than B and C. Besides the effect on appealing color, solution B could inhibit microbial activity although its inhibition effect was not as good as solution A. Thus, solution A could be used as a good preservative in industry. Solution C could inhibit the initial growth of Pseudomonas and partially inhibited the growth of Enterobacteriaceae; however, the content of putrescine in the pork treated with solution C was as high as 30.14 ± 2.89 mg/kg after 21 days of storage at 4°C. Hence, solution C is not an ideal preservative for vacuum-packed chilled pork.
AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different natural preservatives on the microbial profile, the total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N), and biogenic amine contents of vacuum-packed chilled pork during storage at 4°C. Solution A comprised of tea polyphenols, chitosan, spice extract, propolis, and nisin. Solution B comprised of clove extract, cassia bark extract, ginger juice, garlic juice, and lactobacillus fermentation solution. Solution C consisted of only lactobacillus fermentation solution. The results indicated that solution A was a good natural preservative with higher bacteria inhibitory effect and higher sensory score than B and C. Besides the effect on appealing color, solution B could inhibit microbial activity although its inhibition effect was not as good as solution A. Thus, solution A could be used as a good preservative in industry. Solution C could inhibit the initial growth of Pseudomonas and partially inhibited the growth of Enterobacteriaceae; however, the content of putrescine in the pork treated with solution C was as high as 30.14 ± 2.89 mg/kg after 21 days of storage at 4°C. Hence, solution C is not an ideal preservative for vacuum-packed chilled pork.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084980207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084980207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/fsn3.1535
DO - 10.1002/fsn3.1535
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084980207
SN - 2048-7177
VL - 8
SP - 3110
EP - 3118
JO - Food Science and Nutrition
JF - Food Science and Nutrition
IS - 7
ER -