Effective mass in bilayer graphene at low carrier densities: The role of potential disorder and electron-electron interaction

  • J. Li
  • , L. Z. Tan
  • , K. Zou
  • , A. A. Stabile
  • , D. J. Seiwell
  • , K. Watanabe
  • , T. Taniguchi
  • , Steven G. Louie
  • , J. Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a two-dimensional electron gas, the electron-electron interaction generally becomes stronger at lower carrier densities and renormalizes the Fermi-liquid parameters, such as the effective mass of carriers. We combine experiment and theory to study the effective masses of electrons and holes me∗ and mh∗ in bilayer graphene in the low carrier density regime on the order of 1×1011cm-2. Measurements use temperature-dependent low-field Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations observed in high-mobility hexagonal boron nitride supported samples. We find that while me∗ follows a tight-binding description in the whole density range, mh∗ starts to drop rapidly below the tight-binding description at a carrier density of n=6×1011cm-2 and exhibits a strong suppression of 30% when n reaches 2×1011cm-2. Contributions from the electron-electron interaction alone, evaluated using several different approximations, cannot explain the experimental trend. Instead, the effect of the potential fluctuation and the resulting electron-hole puddles play a crucial role. Calculations including both the electron-electron interaction and disorder effects explain the experimental data qualitatively and quantitatively. This Rapid Communication reveals an unusual disorder effect unique to two-dimensional semimetallic systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number161406
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume94
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effective mass in bilayer graphene at low carrier densities: The role of potential disorder and electron-electron interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this