Effects of bitten food images in marketing communications

Ripinka Koli Patil, Courtney Szocs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Marketing communications (e.g., food packages, restaurant menus, coupons, social media posts) often include images of bitten and non-bitten (i.e., complete) foods. Taking an empirics first approach, the current research explores how and why these images influence consumers. A field study shows a higher redemption rate for discount coupons featuring a bitten (vs. non-bitten) food. However, a controlled online study fails to replicate this effect. Two additional preregistered studies shed light on the inconsistent results observed online and in the field by identifying two competing mechanisms catalyzed by bitten food images. Bitten food images lead to vicarious enticement, an automatic process in which a viewer makes sense of a bitten food image by picturing someone approaching and tasting the food, as well as emotional conflict (i.e., the simultaneous activation of positive and negative thoughts and feelings). While vicarious enticement has a positive impact on product responses, emotional conflict has a negative impact. The effect of bitten (vs. non-bitten) food images on product responses appears to depend on the strength of these two mechanisms in a given context. These findings yield insights for researchers examining visual characteristics of food images as well as advertisers designing marketing communications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107566
JournalAppetite
Volume200
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this