TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of genetic and environmental trends from 1970 to 2020 on farm efficiency estimated with a whole-farm modeling system
AU - Dechow, C. D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Dairy Science Association
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - The objectives of this study were to evaluate associations of genetic change, cow management and nutrition, inbreeding, and crop yields from 1970 to 2020 with measures of production and economic efficiency according to a whole-farm model, and to evaluate effects of genetic change in individual traits on economic efficiency in comparison to expectations from economic selection indexes. Genetic and phenotypic performance metrics for Holsteins from 1970 and 2020 were retrieved and input into the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) for a 7,000-cow Texas herd and a 50-cow Pennsylvania grazing herd. Crop yields estimates from 1970 and 2020 were retrieved, and farm hectarage was altered so that forage and energy concentrate requirements were met through farm production; likewise, scenarios evaluating effects of atmospheric CO2 fertilization (CO2F) on crop yield were evaluated by altering farm hectarage. For single traits that could be dynamically modeled by IFSM, performance shifts and resulting change in product prices or management expenses were added to 1970 base models. Economic efficiency was evaluated as the per-cow return to management and unpaid factors as compared with 1970 base models. As averaged across state scenarios, gains in economic efficiency were +$945 and −$76 for additive genetic and inbreeding effects, respectively, for a total gain from genetic change of +$869. Genetic gain in fat yield (+$549) and protein yield (+$524) were responsible for most of the genetic gain, whereas milk yield (−$128) and increased cow BW (−$129) depressed economic efficiency. Genetic change in productive life had a smaller effect (+$44) than predicted unless heifers were purchased and at double the default value. Gains due to cow management and nutrition increased efficiency by +$666 and crop yield increased efficiency by +$711, of which +$371 was attributed to CO2F across scenarios. Whole-farm DM efficiencies derived as the ratio of fat- and protein-corrected milk yield to DMI increased from 0.82 (PA) and 0.97 (TX) in 1970 to 1.20 in 2020 and could be higher if farms reduce the size of their replacement herd by producing beef calves. The landmass required in 2020 was 63% and 78% of the 1970 requirement for Texas and Pennsylvania, respectively. Changes in cow genetic merit, management and nutrition, and crop yields have all increased the economic and environmental sustainability of milk production, and systems such as IFSM could be a useful tool to help inform economic selection indices.
AB - The objectives of this study were to evaluate associations of genetic change, cow management and nutrition, inbreeding, and crop yields from 1970 to 2020 with measures of production and economic efficiency according to a whole-farm model, and to evaluate effects of genetic change in individual traits on economic efficiency in comparison to expectations from economic selection indexes. Genetic and phenotypic performance metrics for Holsteins from 1970 and 2020 were retrieved and input into the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) for a 7,000-cow Texas herd and a 50-cow Pennsylvania grazing herd. Crop yields estimates from 1970 and 2020 were retrieved, and farm hectarage was altered so that forage and energy concentrate requirements were met through farm production; likewise, scenarios evaluating effects of atmospheric CO2 fertilization (CO2F) on crop yield were evaluated by altering farm hectarage. For single traits that could be dynamically modeled by IFSM, performance shifts and resulting change in product prices or management expenses were added to 1970 base models. Economic efficiency was evaluated as the per-cow return to management and unpaid factors as compared with 1970 base models. As averaged across state scenarios, gains in economic efficiency were +$945 and −$76 for additive genetic and inbreeding effects, respectively, for a total gain from genetic change of +$869. Genetic gain in fat yield (+$549) and protein yield (+$524) were responsible for most of the genetic gain, whereas milk yield (−$128) and increased cow BW (−$129) depressed economic efficiency. Genetic change in productive life had a smaller effect (+$44) than predicted unless heifers were purchased and at double the default value. Gains due to cow management and nutrition increased efficiency by +$666 and crop yield increased efficiency by +$711, of which +$371 was attributed to CO2F across scenarios. Whole-farm DM efficiencies derived as the ratio of fat- and protein-corrected milk yield to DMI increased from 0.82 (PA) and 0.97 (TX) in 1970 to 1.20 in 2020 and could be higher if farms reduce the size of their replacement herd by producing beef calves. The landmass required in 2020 was 63% and 78% of the 1970 requirement for Texas and Pennsylvania, respectively. Changes in cow genetic merit, management and nutrition, and crop yields have all increased the economic and environmental sustainability of milk production, and systems such as IFSM could be a useful tool to help inform economic selection indices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210137817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85210137817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3168/jds.2024-25151
DO - 10.3168/jds.2024-25151
M3 - Article
C2 - 39265833
AN - SCOPUS:85210137817
SN - 0022-0302
VL - 107
SP - 11052
EP - 11064
JO - Journal of dairy science
JF - Journal of dairy science
IS - 12
ER -