Abstract
Meta-analytic methods were used to synthesize the results of published randomized, controlled-outcome studies of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients. Forty-five studies reporting 62 treatment-control comparisons were identified. Samples were predominantly White, female, and from the United States. Beneficial effect size d s were.24 for emotional adjustment measures,.19 for functional adjustment measures,.26 for measures of treatment-and disease-related symptoms, and.28 for compound and global measures. The effect size of.17 found for medical measures was not statistically significant for the few reporting studies. Effect sizes for treatment-control comparisons did not significantly differ among several categories of treatment: behavioral interventions, nonbehavioral counseling and therapy, informational and educational methods, organized social support provided by other patients, and other nonhospice interventions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-108 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Health Psychology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Applied Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of Psychosocial Interventions With Adult Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver